Monday, April 28, 2014

Backyard Burn Trail Race Report


I'm not a fan of nature.  My idea of "rustic" is 3G data speeds.  Sure, it's fun to run outside, I'm very poor on treadmills, but generally my fear is based on several things.  Not the least of which is




They give me . . . a reaction:

This is pretty accurate, actually.

Plus, I'm not a fan of tripping over a tree root, rock, lava, whatever the fuck could be out there.  I'm an introvert who has to act extroverted sometimes, and it takes a lot outta me.

I'll just be here, thanks. It has free Wi-Fi.


Meanwhile, I have many running-related friends, as well as favorite bloggers, who keep talking up the wonders of trail running.

Yeah, it's amazing.  Got it.
I had the realization that I ought to ATTEMPT trails, even just a bit.  I'd qualified to enter the JFK 50-miler, and that the first 15 miles or so of that course are pure, hardcore . . . trail.  Presumably, that meant I was going to have to learn how to jump over the above-mentioned tree roots, rocks, and BUGS EVERYWHERE IN MY UNDERPANTS OMG JUMP JUMP JUMP

Me running on a trail.  Minus the tail.  And the cute.

So.  All of THAT brought me to my first Trail race, brought to you by the "Backyard Burn series."

I chose Race #4, which was in Prince William Forest Park.  There was a choice of a 5 or 10 miler, and I figured I'd ease my way into trails by (for once) making the smart choice and going with a short course of 5 miles.

I woke up and kinda had a major case of the nerves.  5 miles is less than I do for a WEEKDAY run, much less a race.  But, nevertheless, I coaxed myself out of bed, absolutely NOT wanting to do this.  I'd just done the GW Parkway race 2 weeks earlier, and knew I wasn't in "race shape" yet.



I had time to dwell and obsess; this race starts at a MUCH more reasonable time (9a.m.) than typical road races (HOLY SHIT a.m.).  I arrived a little early, and tried to convince my Garmin to locate me.  It took a LOOOONG time.  It was almost like my watch couldn't be-effing-lieve I was out there.  In NATURE.



But, after easy same day checkin/pickup of my stuff, they called us over for the briefing, and then we just kind of milled.  No chips, no timing mats.  These were trail runners.  Easy, relaxed, and no pretense.

Boom!  Off we went . . . not on a trail.

Seriously, the race starts off just running down a paved road, then you turn back and run UP the paved road.  And then . . . into the woods.  Nature waits.

Miles 0-2 ("Hey, this isn't so bad OMFG IS THAT A SPIDER??")

9:11, 9:32

The first two miles were just over 9 minutes each, although I was losing time on mile 2 with the generally uphill grade.

It was during this section that we crossed a bridge.  A swinging bridge.


Yeah baby.

A "swinging" bridge isn't some Austin Powers type thing.  It's not a bridge that wears and ascot and has very Open Ideas About Marriage.  Nope.  It's basically supported by ropes or effing twine I don't know I just know it freaking MOVED (a LOT) as I ran on it.

So as we crossed it, runners went up, down, left, right, and if "pooing yourself" was a direction, I'm pretty sure I did that too. 

Miles 2-4 ("I'm a runner.  It's what I do.")
8:42, 9:18

We picked up a nice downhill stretch for mile 3-4, and I started to pass a few folks, while trying to do my best at being sure footed.  I didn't see any falls, just the aftermath of one, where someone was checking on a guy who had slipped doing a downhill.  He seemed ok.

Mile 2-3 came in at 8:42, and I slowed myself a bit from mile 3-4 (9:18) because I wasn't sure if I'd end up like the scraped up guy.  But this was where I basically caught my breath and remembered that as much as I like to think of myself as a fraud when it comes to running, I'm not bad at this sport.  I just had to settle down and stop focusing that we were being watched by living things with 35 legs or something.

Mile 4-5 ("Oh, just quit.  It's a huge hill.  Wait, there's pizza up there!")
10:56

This mile featured two pretty substantial hills.  The first one, which was VERY steep, was marked by trail runners ahead of me all stopping to walk, which I do get from my reading of blogs, etc. is a Thing Trail Runners Do.  That's fine by me.  I fell into place, and walked.

The second hill came after some runners moved to the side to let me pass, and I started to finally feel like I was going to get through this thing. 

There was a REALLY big dude ahead of me during that second hill.  He was slowing down, and I really had no choice but to pass him, because if I --did-- slow, I worried about being able to get momentum to keep going.  He's in the background for these race shots of me:


So.  Effing.  FAT.


Whee! Hang loo--OMG TREES EVERYWHERE HALP MEEE

But I got past him, and wondered, with mild curiosity, where the finish line would end up being, as I know trail runs aren't exactly . . . exact.  I kept telling myself to kick.  I knew I had energy left, as these 5 miles hadn't been super hard for me, but I just kind of . . . settled.

Sigh.  That's exactly what I'd done for some of the later miles of GW Parkway.  I hadn't really learned anything, and certainly wasn't "back" into racing shape.

I was just there, running, when out of nowhere, the big guy passed ME.  As he did, he patted me on the shoulder, to encourage me.  Damn.  At this point, I wasn't really sure what to do.  What's the etiquette here? 

1.  Go WITH him?  You aren't really supposed to run side by side on trails, based on what they said at the briefing.

2.  Pass him again?  Trail races are friendly things, not cutthroat.  He was nothing but nice to me, and it seemed like he just wanted to really crank at the end.  Turns out that he was in his mid-20s (maybe he was weirded out that a guy in his late 40s had passed him?).

3.  Let him go?  But you're supposed to give your all at races, right?

I chose option #3, gave him a thumbs up, and made some crack about me drafting off him.  He finished less than 5 seconds ahead of me, and I just kind of trotted the sloped up hill towards the finish.  A guy called out our bib numbers as we came in, and that was that.

Finishing Time:  Under 47 minutes, faster than a 9:25 pace.  My last mile took under 11 minutes, but it was marked by me noticeably slowing down towards the end, as well as the early walking part.

But still, I'd survived Nature!


I looked for pizza.  And it was there.  So.  Much.  Pizza.  I held back from inhaling TOO much, as there were still 10-mile racers out there (probably being eaten by a grue).





If interested, he's the elevation map, at least according to my Garmin:

Backyard Burn Spring Race #4, Prince William Forest Park Elevation Map




And that's that.  My first trail run.  The numbers were about where I expected them, although I was a little surprised at how much worse my numbers were compared to road races.


Race by the numbers:
Overall:  Top 34.5%

Men:  Top 46%

Division:  A rather perfect median (half above, half below).  

Split?  Definitely a positive split again, perhaps by as much as a full minute, almost all attributed to the walk up the hill at the end.


Stuff I learned:

1.  Trail races are fun.
2.  Trail racers are indeed pretty laid back and chill.
3.  The food at the end of the BYB series is fantastic, and plentiful.


Stuff I didn't learn:

1.  A little more self-confidence here would have helped. I slowed towards the end, not just because we all walked a hill, but because I just didn't want to be competitive.

2.  This type of run really didn't assist me in seeing what JFK would be like.  Trails are different.  The JFK portion is far more treacherous, and this entire race, while technical, was quite forgiving and pleasant.

3.  I'm still scared of bugs.


That's that.  A good race, a fun race, but a race I treated more like an outdoor workout than anything else.  I just need to convince myself that it's ok to have done that.

Monday, April 14, 2014

GW Parkway Classic 10 Miler Race Report

April 13, 2014:  The GW Parkway Classic 10 Miler:  Fail, Forget, Forge ahead.

The last time I ran a race was the Richmond Marathon, narrowly missing my second sub-4 hour marathon time. But, in my defense, it was my 2nd marathon in 20 days, so . . . meh.  I had a good run in Richmond, posted a one SECOND positive split there, and was otherwise proud to come within a couple of minutes of a PR.  I took the train home, settled into my couch.  Watched the snow fall.  And ate.  And ate.

(repeat for about two months)

It was a looooooong damn winter.  Too long.  Too cold.  The polar vortex wrecked me.



Well, yes, I did indeed spend almost 3 weeks in Maui again, but still, the polar vortex absolutely wrecked me.  I'd put on roughly 7 pounds from December to February, mainly because of some pain post-colonoscopy, along with some ancillary . . . effects.

DON'T GO THERE!
 Finally, by March, I FORCED myself to go back out into the seriously-WTF-is-it-still-doing-here cold weather, and managed to trot some miles out.  The problem was that I'd already failed my first lesson by not just getting into the pool, a mistake I swore I'd never make again.  I was just so cold all the time, and generally feeling not myself (see above GIF).

I'd spent the winter eyeing the Princeton Ironman 70.3 race.  My right shoulder was giving me some grief, so I wasn't looking at it TOO longingly, but still - if I learned anything from the last time I had a long downtime from injury, it's that cross-training does wonders.

Instead, I ate my feelings.

EAT EAT EAT NOBODY LOVES YOU HAHAHAHAHAHA!


By the time I was done with March, I'd recorded a measly FIFTY running miles for the month, which is decidedly NOT what you should shoot for if you're prepping for a 10-mile race in April (and had a goal of PRing your 10-mile time).  

I ran the race with three goals in mind. I'd tweeted them publicly . . . plus I had one secret goal:

1.  Don't die.
2.  Smile.
3.  Drink a beer post-race (I've never --not once-- done this).
4.  (secret goal: challenge yourself a bit, shoot for an 8:30 pace, so a 1:25 finish)

The "don't die" thing wasn't just hyperbole.  I had not run 10 miles since the November 2013 Richmond Marathon.  In fact, the FARTHEST I'd run since mid-November was a single 8.7 mile run (14K) - on January 1, 2014.  Otherwise, all my runs were roughly 4-6 miles.

So I was about to run 10 miles, after never running more than 6 miles . . . over the past 4 month period.  Clearly, setting a time goal of 1:25, faster than almost ALL of my prior 10-mile race times was a wise decision:

RACE PREPARATION IS MY MIDDLE NAME!
Also, I focused on this race specifically comparing it to the Cherry Blossom 10-Miler, since I'd missed getting an entry for it, in order to see how the two races, set about a week apart, stacked up against each other.

Let's get to the reporting:

Packet pickup:

The GW Parkway Classic boasts one of the smoothest packet pickups EVAR, because it could be done at ANY Pacers location, basically anytime they were open.  Whenever you showed up dictated what bib number you were given.  They just coded your name to the number, handed you a goodie bag, and that was it!

Pro/Con comparison to Cherry Blossom:  With packet pickup at the building museum for the CUCB, using voluntary pickup times depending on your last name, the crowds here are usually pretty notorious.  BUT, on the other hand, there's an actual honest-to-goodness Expo here.  At Pacers, it's whatever the store has, that's your Expo.

Advantage:  This all depends.  Do you like to browse at Expos?  Then Cherry Blossom will be for you, because it will have plenty of booths/entertainment/samples.  On the other hand, if you're more of a "get in, get out" person (that's what she said!) then you'll probably find the GW Parkway Classic more to your liking.

Getting to the race:


The GW Parkway Classic is a point-to-point race, where you're bussed to the start in the EARLY hours of the morning (not "Disney marathon early," but there's still a reasonable chance you'll pass people doing a pre-dawn walk of shame home --- LIKE I SAW!).


Why good morning to YOU, lady in 6-inch heels and a party dress!

I drove down to Old Town Alexandria (motto: "See(e) our Goodly Olde Framme Shoppes") and found parking pretty easily, just a few blocks from the bus loading area.  After settling on a (free) street parking spot, I grabbed my stuff and found the bus area.

One problem:  No nutrition.  Dammit.  I was clearly rusty on what to bring to a race.  Fortunately, I'd eaten my customary powerbar(s) for breakfast, and figured I'd be ok.  I mean, what could go wrong?  I mean, I AM TAI EFFING FUNG, THE GUY WHO CAN RUN RACES WITHOUT SERIOUSLY TRAINING FOR THEM!!!!


THAT RIVER IS JUST TEARS OF HOTNESS CRIED BY UNDERESTIMATING LAVA MONSTERS WHAT UNDERESTIMATED ME AND THUS CRIED LAVA TEARS FORMING A RIVER.  OF HOT LAVA.

Unfortunately, there's a reason for the saying, "You can't outrun your fitness."  

Or something like that.



I loaded myself onto the bus, and experienced my first feelings of dread.  Driving the course headed to the start was a little disheartening.  You see ALL the course, and realize you have to run THAT WHOLE THING.  It felt intimidating to see it all laid out before I even started to run, knowing how undertrained I was.

I arrived, and met up with some Twitter friends, including Teresa, Kristin, and fellow blogger M.  Kris helpfully and happily handed over a GU for me (score!), and I felt like I had almost no reason to worry.  Remember your goals, fatass!  Anyway, we had a nice chat, and I sauntered over to the starting area.

Pro/Con comparison to Cherry Blossom: Getting here is actually pretty easy, but if you live near a Metro, I suspect it's easier/quicker to get to the CUCB race.  On the other hand, the CUCB corrals fill up VERY fast.  I saw lots of people just relaxing at this race pre-start.

Advantage:  Sorry, again no clear winner here.  Do you live in DC or Maryland?  Likely you'll want the CUCB when it comes to this kind of thing.  Virginia?  You might have an easier time getting here instead.

After bidding my Tweeps good luck at the race, I seeded myself modestly, and tried to hide my mouth from a ton of idling buses which had not yet been cleared from the race starting area.  They delayed the start slightly, but then we were off!

Miles 1-2 ("forget everything you planned and run like hell")
8:17, 8:23

Idiot.  I hit the first mile in 8:17, which was stupid fast, and the second mile in 8:23, which was STILL stupidly fast.  Had it been THAT long since I'd raced, that I forgot the cardinal rule??


YOU CAN'T BANK TIME, YOU IDIOT!


Miles 3-4 ("SEE???")
8:46, 8:51

I was already slowing down, falling to my fitness, posting splits of 8:46 and 8:51.  Damn, damn, damn!  Although according to the "hill elevation profile for the GW Parkway Classic" (hint: it's just my Garmin's data), I was dealing with a steady diet of climbing at this point:


GW Parkway Classic Hill Elevation Profile, or at least what my 610 thought I ran that day.



Mile 5 ("OMG GU ME")  
9:15

This mile was of course slower because I walked through a water stop to take GU, so 9:15.  Not as bad as it could have been with me walking, and yielding a first half split time of 43 minutes and change, so just over an 8:40 pace.



Miles 6-8 ("This would be a good time to improve")
8:30, 8:45, 8:54

When/if you run this race, right about at the halfway point, just a touch past it, is a stone bridge that goes above you.  That's your cue to open up your throttle, assuming you run this race conservatively at the start, and through the half.  I hadn't, but I did try to muster some speed back.

These three miles came in a touch better:  8:30 (steady downhill), 8:45, 8:54 (climbing again).  I was working up a decent sweat, although that was clearly my downtime "rewarding" me for months of eating and drinking to excess while I wallowed in self-pity over my reaction to the winter.





Miles 9 and 10 ("Let's at least finish proudly? No? Ok then, let's just finish."
9:00, 8:38

The finishing miles to this race has another series of climbs, and Garmin shows a steady climb from about 8.3 to 8.8, so about a half mile climb before you hit the mile 9 marker.  The hills definitely punished me again, and I unfortunately posted my worst mile (9:00, I don't count the one where I walked through the water stop).

Mile 10 featured me basically saying, "Ok, this race is a disaster, deal with it, crank with whatever you have left and hold your head up high.  It ended up that my last mile was 8:38, still slower than my goal pace.

I finished in about 87 and a half minutes, 2 and a half minutes slower than my goal.

All told, my finishing time for 10-mile races had this in the upper half (it's my 4th best out of 9 races at this distance).  There was a lot to be happy with because I didn't die, didn't get hurt, smiled here and there, and just decided I was going to use this race to learn the VALUABLE lesson that when you're a guy in your late 40s, you are ALWAYS in training mode.  

Almost immediately after finishing, I saw M post-race.  We chatted a bit about the race, but I was too thunderstruck with (basically) failing that I was intent on looking for beer.  I didn't have reliable numbers at that point.  It just FELT like a bad race.  M's "DH" called her phone, and I kept up with my search.

Artist's conception of M's "DH" (trust me, she's laughing at this)

My mood improved, though.  I found Teresa and Kris post-race, and we were laughing it up over some brews.  I discovered that beer tastes DARN TOOTING GOOD post-run, and even got a couple of extra beers, courtesy of some kind beer-coupon-donors.  Teresa talked me down off the ledge post-race:





Kris was hilarious.  She not ONLY shared some beer with me, she didn't slap me when I made a jizz-related joke, and I got this "review" later that day!



Ha!  So THERE!


On to the math:




Race by the numbers:


First/Second half split:  Positive by 12 seconds.  Boo.  Could have been worse, but boo.

Time:  Under 87.5 minutes (about an 8:45 pace)

Overall: Top 25.5%

Sex: Top 40.8%


Age Division:  Top 36.8%

Stuff I learned:


1.  It's ok to do a race and just run the damn thing to finish.
2.  Post-race beers are tasty, how come nobody told me??
3.  Going out too fast in a race will be a problem most of the time, especially in long distances. 

Finally, a couple more comparisons of this race to the CUCB:

First, the course:

Everyone knows one of the big draws of the CUCB race:  It's near-pancake flat.  Sure, there's a slight climb as you pass the Bureau of Engraving/Printing and Holocaust Museum, but otherwise, this is a FLAT course.  Flat usually equals fast.

For the Parkway Classic, pre-race, I heard an awful lot of chatter from people who talked about how this course is a "net downhill."  That's true, but I think some runners need to understand that "net downhill" is NOT the same thing as "no uphills."  You'll face some hills here.  Regardless, this course is tough, but fair.  I know quite a few people who have PR'd their 10-mile distance on it, and I think it has less to do with the "net downhill" the race boasts, and far MORE to do with the wide-open spaces you get from my next factor . . . .

Second, the field:

One consistent gripe against the CUCB is the crowd while you're running.  I've done it six times, and pretty much every time I was shoulder-to-shoulder almost the entire 10 miles.  That takes a LOT of work to navigate if you are shooting for a specific finish time, or need to maintain a certain pace.

Conversely, the GW Parkway Classic opens up almost completely by mile marker #1.  There were times I could have put my arms out "East/West" as I ran and not come close to touching a person.  That was great, and offered me a good chance to maintain a decent line (for instance, my 2nd half was only .02 off of 5 miles).

Third, crowd support

I could not give LESS of a rat's ass about having crowd support.  I appreciate it, but when I race, I'm there to race.  But some people really like the energy of a crowd.  Again, there's a clear split here.  With CUCB, you have enthusiastic spectators for a decent portion of the race, even more enthusiastic volunteers, and generally great views (for you and a zillion other people at the same time).

With GW, it's quite subdued.  Vast stretches of just you and the other runners chugging along with nice gaps between you all for maneuvering purposes.  Every so often, a cluster of neighbors/friends looking for a runner, and waving at you.

So, what's important to you?  Ease of arriving?  An extra hour of sleep?  Avoiding crowds?  A flat course?

I really have to conclude that virtually the only thing these races have in common is the distance.  There's almost nothing similar about them otherwise.  You have to decide, when you're choosing a Spring race, if you want to run it for time, but also factor in WHERE you're going to stay in the DC area.  Do you want to see the Cherry Blossoms (assuming they're in bloom), or do you want to come out and crank for 10 miles and not worry about dodging people as you run?  Do hills make you sick?  Or does the idea of a marquee-level race like CUCB really turn you on?

Only you can answer those questions, not me.

I'm happy I did this race.  I got a nice tech shirt, and even got a medal this year, so that's all good.  I "failed" in the sense that I asked my body to do something I hoped it could do, and it told me to go Mai-Tai myself.  But I'm wiser.  I want to take this experience and learn from it.  I want to forge ahead, and fall forward.

I hope you do too.

Aloha.















Sunday, January 12, 2014

You gotta have a heart (rate)!

Note:  Updated below!

I've been running since I was a teenager.  It started out as me walking to the good ol' "Magic Cavern" arcade in Myrtle Beach, SC.  It was an escape from the general torment that was slathered on me as a shy New Yorker who'd moved to SC.  It was, also almost to the foot, exactly 1 mile from my house.

Summer day after summer day, I'd run there.  Same in the fall.  Let's just say I was "a nerd for all seasons."

Anyway, off I went to college, where I got involved with weight training, and eventually mixed in some martial arts work.  But, I still ran.  Not as far, but I ran.  Then, I went back to distance running in 2005, this time on a much more serious basis.  When I restarted, the idea of anyone running 10 miles was mind-boggling.  In a couple of years, that distance became a routine weekend training run.

NOTE:  All that above is meant as a foundation, not a brag.  You'll see what I mean.

One thing I didn't do, that a lot of typical hardcore runners did, was wear a heart rate monitor.  I just didn't bother.  Finally, in 2012, I strapped up, and started to review my numbers.

I was ASTONISHED at the numbers.  VERY high.  Meanwhile, as I was running, my breath was NOT labored at all.

By way of background, Garmin separates heartrates into 5 "zones."  I haven't seen any definitive layout of what they are, but from culling posts from other users, it seems to roughly default to this:
  • Warmup Zone: 50-60% of Heart Rate Reserve, used for warmup and cooldown
  • Recover Zone: 60-70% of Heart Rate Reserve, used for long, slow runs or cycling, or for recovery rides and runs
  • Aerobic Zone: 70-80% of Heart Rate Reserve, used for overall cardiovascular fitness.
  • Anaerobic Zone: 80-90% of Heart Rate Reserve, used for for training to increase your lactate threshold
  • Redline Zone: 90-100% of Heart Rate Reserve, used only by the very fit for short periods, usually for interval training.

So, I am very often told by Garmin that I had a "training effect" of 5.0 (meaning, I overdid it).  It will tell me that my heartrate was in the zone where I was basically pushing and pushing and pushing.  Essentially, Garmin was telling me that I trying too hard.

The problem is, it rarely felt like it.  Sure, if I was on a track, and was pounding out the last 100m of a run, I'm sure I'd haul booty, but it's not the same thing.  So I devised a plan.

The plan was (and still is):  As I'm running, I will say, out loud,

"The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain."

Yup.  That.  Out loud.  If I'm able to say the sentence, and not heave out word-by-word, I know I'm not in maximum zone.  But, if the sentence is labored, I know I'm working (I usually do know that). 

I mostly do this sentence when I'm trotting along, ostensibly hoping for a aerobic workout, such as a long run where I should be keeping my speed slower.  I've been chagrined sometimes if/when someone passes me as I say it out loud.  But the trouble is, I don't know what else to do?

Here's how heart rate percentages are calculated:

220 - age = max heart rate.

That's it.

So, that means some dude who played in an arcade his whole life --getting there via a "rascal" scooter, smoking packs of cigarettes to/from the arcade has the same max heart rate as me, assuming we're the same age.  But, recall my foundational life of running (see?  I wasn't bragging before!).  Surely, that has to count for something?

I suspect it does, but I don't know whether (or how much) to adjust my HR numbers on my Garmin.  I can't really afford a VO2 test, at least I don't think I can.  And I don't know how much to change it if I were to guess, just based on breathing.  I do realize that I can probably readjust these numbers within Garmin Connect, but I haven't done it.  Maybe I'll have to take the next step in my training.

So, what do I do in the meantime?

The answer is, as always, "Keep training."  Sure, my Garmin will squawk at me for having a "training effect" of 5.0 (overreaching), but on the other hand, I'm still self-evaluating while I run, all the while reciting the most famous line from "My Fair Lady."

I bet THAT gets your heart racing.

===============================

Update #1 of 2:

I heard from Jennifer who has the same issue, but she's paid for 2 VO2 tests.


And then I got a great suggestion from Adam, at Lesser is More with a great suggestion:







This strikes me as a good idea -- at a track. No interruptions, no stoplights, no detours. Hell, not even any hills. Just 12 circles (I'll do 3 miles even), and see what the numbers give me.

Thanks for the input, folks!

===============================

Update #2 of 2:

Here is a link to the new formula for getting a max HR.  It's made a huge difference already for me.

Sunday, January 05, 2014

2014 Word of the Year

I've been seeing numerous running/fitness bloggers take up this question, and so I thought I'd add my own to the list, in the form of a quick post.

Looking back, the year for 2013 would have been, "Redemption."  The reasons aren't surprising, if you know anything about me from blogging or Twitter.  I came back from injury after injury to make 2013 the fastest and fittest of my adult life.

But, what about 2014?  What word will I think to myself?

Here's a clue:

I have a handy-dandy notebook, but you know it as an iPhone.

No, not the CLUES themselves -- I mean the answer lies with the guy himself:

I hate to burst your bubble.  Well, it's kinda fun.
No, really.  That guy right up there:

Yes, that's "Steve Burns," of "Blue's Clues" fame.  Although it's not watched (much) anymore in my home, I was a big fan of Blue's Clues (as a parent!).  When Steve left the show and released a solo album, "Songs for Dustmites" in 2003, I was struck by how good it was.  It was produced by Steven Drozd of The Flaming Lips, and had a fun, sweet, and science-y feel to it.

This is one of my favorite songs on the Album, although I have many:

The song is called, "Maintain."



I guess this word runs counter to what a lot of people might think. Most people want to improve, right?

WRONG!
My main goal simply to not let up.

Don't quit.

Don't flare out early, like a sparkler.

Show that 2013 was not a fluke, and those PRs were not an aberration.

Maintain.

Saturday, January 04, 2014

DC Soup Run 5 miler and 5K Race Report

The old adage about, "If you can't say anything nice," was clearly never said by a blogger.

Let me first state, however, that I'm glad there is a DC Running Club.  They're new(ish), they're trying, and they're obviously not in control of the weather.  But, there were some screwups on their part for this race.  I'm out nearly $50, and am kicking myself for even signing up for this thing, when EVERY instinct I possess told me it was a bad idea to sign up for it.  I'd previously stated that I'm feeling very flat as a runner.  But, I'd hoped a New Year's kickoff race would get me jump started.

Here's why I my instincts were alerting:

First, there was virtually no race communication, and even less explanation about the race itself on their website.  Some brave soul actually asked about what the details were on their FB page, and in response, there they were -- actual race instructions!  Nothing in e-mail, nothing on their Twitter feed, but, if you checked the correct post on FB, and read the replies, you'd find out details.



FAIL.

Next, I had some concerns about the course.  With the recent snow/ice we'd had, I wasn't sure what kind of terrain we'd have:


Beware of snow, ice, and Bumbles.
Because I am, you know, aware of what life is like in DC, last night I actually drove out to Hains Point, the site of the race.  I found very sketchy conditions.  Untreated roads, and black ice as of 7:30pm the night before the race:


This is JUST past the starting gate.
Close up of the terrain.

So, based on some earlier advice on Twitter (from some very kind Tweeps), I ran out to REI and bought some YakTrax.

Saturday morning (today, as I write this) came, and it was 18F (11F w/wind), and I bundled up, putting on basically everything I own:




And I drove off to the race . . .

So how'd the race go, Tai??




I had one of these moments when I drove up. Before I could even park, someone stopped me, and basically said this:





WAT.





I MEAN, WHAT???





Yes, he explained that the Park Service told them the roads were clear as of last night, but that this morning, they cancelled the race due to icy conditions.  You know, the conditions I DROVE OUT TO PERSONALLY INSPECT THE NIGHT BEFORE?! 

Nobody thought to come take a look at the course??

I parked, and sat in my car.

I checked their Twitter feed. Nothing.

I checked their FB page. Nothing.

I checked my e-mail. Nothing.

So their notification system was (almost literally!) at the last possible moment they could announce it.

I asked about a refund, or applying the race fees to another race.  Instead, they asked us to come together and contact the Park Police to complain on Monday.  Why?

It suddenly clicked with me -- THEY had likely paid the Park Service.  They likely don't HAVE our race fees anymore:





The conclusion for all of this is that I just bought myself a $48 t-shirt, then went on a training run.

HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE! 

===============
Update:

Courtesy of DCShowGirl, on Instagram, who went out running at Hains Point around the 11:00 hour, here's a daylight shot of the course:


Photo used with permission of DCShowGirl!  Thanks much!